https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:50904 Thu 10 Aug 2023 13:31:43 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:51341 1.5 (Incomplete VICC = INR>1.5 and complete VICC = ≥3.0). Results: A total of 272 confirmed snakebites (Russell’s viper[76], hump-nosed viper[89], non-venomous snakes[51] and unidentified bites[56]) were recruited (median age: 42 y [interquartile range: 30- 53 y]; 189 males [69%]). On admission, 82 (30%) had incomplete VICC (INR >1.5 and <3) and 77 (28%) had complete VICC (INR ≥3). Sixteen (6%) developed clinically apparent bleeding. The WBCT-15 had the best sensitivity of 47% for detecting VICC and 68% for complete VICC. The sensitivities of the WBCT-20, WBCT-25, CBCT-5 and CBCT-10 was 30–35%. The sensitivities of all tests were better in detecting complete VICC, VICC in Russell’s viper bites and more than 2 h post-bite. The WBCT-15 test had a sensitivity of 76% for VICC in confirmed Russell’s viper bites. For detection of VICC, CBCT-t had an an excellent sensitivity of 97%, but a poor specificity of 35% for an optimal cut-off of >6.25 min. Conclusion: WBCTs are poorly diagnostic for VICC in Russell’s viper and hump-nosed viper envenoming, missing up to two-thirds of patients for some tests. The WBCT-15 was the best test, improving for more severe VICC and greater than 2 h post-bite.]]> Fri 01 Sep 2023 13:35:05 AEST ]]>